Shaping a (Non)Sense of Self
glazed porcelain, wood, photographic transfer, 2016
Shaping a (Non)Sense of Self is my show for the Art and Humanities MFA at DJCAD.
This exhibition is the result of my reflection on identity, otherness and performativity, a reflection that I carried out through a year-long experimentation with ceramics, printmaking, oil painting and fictocriticism, mainly focusing on the human figure and its dialogue with the surroundings.
The idea underpinning my work is that our identity is not fixed, nor is it the result of arbitrary decisions; it is rather co-created and constantly informed by our actions and interactions with the objects and people we encounter while we progress in time. We are stories cast like dice into history, and I am interested in exploring how our sense of ‘self’ is shaped by our relationship with the time and place we happen to occupy and our experiences with the ‘other’. My interest in storytelling, dialogue and human engagement is deeply rooted in my passion for theatre and literature, and important to my practice are also Surrealism and the concepts of metamorphosis and contingency.
General View
Almost all of the works included in the show were realised towards the end of the course, when I made myself the case study for my research and I was assigned the studio in which to stage its outcome. The space itself consciously informed the direction my practice took, and I appropriated and reworked a few elements of it, such as the room’s curtains, some vinyl letters left on the walls and a discarded statue found there.
I also tried to arrange the pieces by emulating the way I tend to arrange the components in drawn works, paying extreme attention to details, suggesting metamorphoses and placing some works in unexpected places, as a reward for the keenest observers.
In this exhibition, mirrors play a fundamental role too, helping viewers navigate the space, consider things from a different angle and witness how their presence informs my works. Mirrors are also a metaphor for contemplation and an invitation to self-reflection.
In fact, with the premise of identity existing as a dialogue between one and another, in this show I invite visitors to find in my creations – in myself made image, object and literary work – the ‘other’ to confront themselves with, in order to set forth on the exploration of themselves.
Artist Statement
glazed porcelain, wood, photographic transfer on paper, 2016
I seek simplicity
I slip into Surrealism
I seek I slip I sleep I stumble on oneiric obstacles
I rise I rinse my face I find friends eyes hands stairs whose ends are lost into too many beginnings
I initially explored the idea of metamorphosis, dialogue and contingency mostly by rescuing discarded objects upon which to base my practice, unravelling and informing the (extra)ordinary stories recounted by the signs of past activity those objects bear. Lines, cuts, marks traced on diverse materials have driven me to outline faces, heads, hands of people I know and merge their physical features with those of places and events I see as constitutive of their identity. Eventually, I made myself the raw material for my practice. Instead of tracing the narrative of another character, I turned myself into image, object and (literary) work.
I started scouting out stories from lost objects and ended up finding myself as a lost object to observe,
inform and
fool with
.
Foolstop
photographs printed onto cotton, red thread, mirror, 2016
Foolstop is my work in response to the discourse on tragedy carried out during the MFA Philosophy core module.
It consists of two life-size photographs of my bare torso printed onto cloth, one taken on white background hung facing the white wall, the other, on black background, hanging from the same support facing the viewers as they approach. My head was completely shaved for the making of this work, in order to reach a sort of primal, androgynous simplicity and help visitors identify with it regardless for their gender.
In Foolstop, an almost genderless fool's top welcomes the observers with its dark side, and those who’s exploration of the work stops with the first image become fools because they do not engage with its white counterpart and thus miss the totality of the work. Only by experiencing both the bright and dark side of Foolstop, and making their way around it, can the viewers contemplate the contrast it displays and also the kinship that binds the two images. In fact, the two sides of the work are sewn together with a red thread that is representative of the bond underpinning oppositions, the tension of the dialogue through which the opposite poles sustain one another.
Opposition is crucial to the work, as it is a powerful means of identification through the negation of one’s opposite. Although apparently conflicting, the two sides of Foolstop actually need their counterpart in order to be defined as ‘bright’ and ‘dark’ respectively, as they are only such by comparison to each other. Another contrast is manifest within the figure itself, for the position and colour of the arms are actually the prime signifier of the character's tragic inner conflict.
Artist Book
screen print and photographic transfer on paper, 2016
Foolstop, a Dramatic Reflection on Polarity Unclothed on Cloth
Within this book, I reflect upon the relationship between my practice and some philosophic concepts that have informed Foolstop, my work in response to the MFA Philosophy course on tragedy.
Mindful of the philosophical concern with the accordance of form and content in art and given the dualistic nature of the Foolstop itself, I conceived this reflection on philosophy, tragedy and practice as a theatrical dialogue between its two opposing sides. In the book, insights on Foolstop’s creation and meaning thus appear through a conversation between M, its dark side, and W, the bright one. While echoing my personal view of the piece, the voices of M and W also aim at symbolising the work’s own agency, the fragmentation of the self and the idea of human beings as always, ultimately playing a role, impersonating multiple characters throughout their lives.
Foolstop’s dualism is mirrored in this work’s structure by the neat segregation of text and images, each occupying only one side of the concertina book. Although separate, both the visual and verbal components of the book contribute to the unfolding of the same narrative. Moreover, the pictures themselves are the result of a dialogue with the photographer, Patricia Ramaer, who kindly listened to and recorded my body’s visual utterances.
Surreal Token
plaster umbrella, leather belt, acrylic paint, 2016
Costellazione Casa, detail
Costellazione Casa
discarded lampshade, plaster umbrella, wooden ladder, acrylic paint, 2016
Reflection
Mother
wooden ladder, acrylic paint, 2016
Costellazione Casa, detail
Vessels Series
glazed porcelain, 2016
Behind the creation of these jugs lies the idea that people are always performing a role, in society as on a stage, and are usually identified with their function within that environment. More images and information about these ceramic pieces can be found in the gallery section to them dedicated.
In the production process, great was the support offered by Sean Kingsley and Raquel Garzón Calderón, DJCAD technician and student respectively, whose commitment proved me that in some educational environments true dialogue exists, and teaching is not just about professors pouring data into students’ head and expecting them to pour it out during examinations, as tamed jugs.
Cry
Sail On
Half Awake
Psyche
butterfly, egg, 2015
Beeloved
oil paint on wood, insects (he fears), 2015
Index
unglazed porcelain, 2016
I'm Fine
rearranged text from previous exhibition, clothes hanger, belongings, 2016
Amore a tempo determinato
Io non ti cercavo
Tu mi hai trovato
Aun asì
amar non è
sbagliato
Presenza
rearranged text from previous exhibition, clothes hanger, belongings;
unglazed porcelain, 2016
I'm Fine, Vulnerable, reflection
Vulnerable
unglazed porcelain, 2016
Andrea
discarded statue, acrylic paint, ribbon, (my) hair, 2016
Andrea is paradigmatic of my love for lost objects and the potential of the overlooked. In itself, it results from the combination of discarded materials: a damaged statue neglected in my studio’s storage room and my braid, the hair I was left with when I shaved my head for the making of Foolstop. Andrea’s appearance might mislead the viewers into believing that they are beholding a lady, instead of a Greek man. In fact, at a first glance the statue’s traditional chiton might be mistaken for a ‘feminine garment’, and, consequently, the man’s true sexual identity might be overlooked. To exploit the potential ambiguity of Andrea’s aspect, I played with other elements that are usually believed to pertain to the category of the ‘feminine’, namely long hair and cosmetics. In particular, I added my braid to the statue and painted red its lips and nails, enhancing the traces of varnish those areas bore.
With Andrea, I wished to make a statement about gender performativity starting from its very name, which contributes to the work’s ambiguity especially in the Italian language. Etymologically, ‘Andrea’ derives from the Greek ἀνήρ (anēr, genitive andrós), which indicates the man with specific reference to his masculinity. While in English and most other languages it is considered a female name, ‘Andrea’ is used for both male and female in Italian: it has the potential to confuse, and yet its original meaning refers directly to virility.
Andrea is also meant to be Foolstop’s counterpart in the room. The statue’s position mirrors Foolstop’s one, counterbalancing the lightness of the hung piece with its stature. Moreover, the missing arms of the plaster figure are reflected in the lack of legs of the other work.